Friday, December 21, 2012

The Chaos of Not Closing the Loop

When I was a kid growing up in the 1970’s there was a popular electric football game manufactured by Tudor. This was even before the first hand-held electronic football games, where all the "players" were little red dots and lines. It consisted of a metal playing surface painted like an actual football field, complete with yard lines and end zones. The plastic players were detailed with your favorite team’s uniform and helmet colors, and each position-player was molded into a permanent stance that best suited him for action. As for the ball, it was a tiny little piece of brown foam cut into the shape of a football. Yeah, high-tech stuff right here:


My buddy Eddie had one of these games. Eddie and I spent a long, long time setting up our “teams” for the first play of the game. We thought-out highly detailed game plans, and invested appropriate amounts of time to painstakingly align each and every player in the perfect position to move the ball forward (or stop the ball carrier, if you were the one whose team was on defense). From the offensive line to the wide receivers to the running backs, we knew the players, their capabilities, and their roles. We had the plan, knew the plays, and it all added up to helping us achieve our goal of scoring (or stopping) touchdowns and ultimately winning the game.

Once we had everything in place, Eddie flipped the ON switch to power whatever mechanism was located under the metal football field's surface. The field suddenly vibrated to life, and hopefully set our teams on the proper course of action. We cheered in anticipation, we hollered encouragement! Then, after that first nanosecond, the players began to move in every other direction BUT where we wanted. Players from the same team collided, the quarterback spun in circles, other players vibrated themselves completely off of the surface and onto the oblivion of the living room carpet below. After a mere five seconds, the utter carnage was great and terrible. More times than not, our teams lost yardage. Furthermore, touchdowns were a rarity that happened by sheer accident. To make matters worse, it took so long to reset everything after each play, we soon became discouraged and lost interest entirely.

We had the right players, the right goals, the right tools, and provided proper encouragement. What we didn’t have was a way to stay engaged once the game went “live”. We simply turned our players loose and hoped for the best outcome.
I really hope your leadership style isn't like our electric football game experience. I mean, Eddie and I were eventually rescued by the invention of Atari, but who is going to rescue you? It's one thing to have all the vision, strategy, and people in place. As a leader, you must close the loop by implementing follow-up and follow-through methods to make sure your people stay on-track to accomplish the goals you set for them. Without your verification and inspection, they will succumb to the chaos and carnage of the realities in which they work. The last thing you want is to have your people vibrate off the playing field because you didn’t guide them through to completion.

One thing to clarify: I am not even remotely in the neighborhood of discussing or agreeing with anything that resembles micromanagement. If you hired the right people, set their goals and expectations, gave them proper tools, and encourage them regularly, why would you need to micromanage? In addition, the right people - those who are self-motivated - do not need to be micromanaged. Do they need you to lead and guide them, coach them, and keep them pointed in the right direction? Of course.

So, work hard to set them up for success before you turn the switch to ON - then follow up to make sure they are on track. Otherwise, like me and Eddie, you may end up with something like this:


Thanks for reading.

J.

Friday, March 30, 2012

The Right Kind of Problem-Solving, Part II

Let’s talk about an overlooked and somewhat misunderstood area of problem-solving: attitude. Yes, yes, life is whatever-percent of what happens to us, and whatever-percent of how we deal with it. Got it, thanks. And yes, people seem to be labeled as either positive or negative in terms of their perspective. Someone is either a “glass is half-empty” person, or a “glass is half-full” person. Right now you might be labeling me as negative because I listed “glass is half-empty” first (see how I messed with you like that?). In all seriousness, I am neither half-full nor half-empty. Instead, I consider myself a “flat-tire” person.

Think of a time when you had a flat tire. You were undoubtedly on your way to somewhere important like work, a meeting, or the grocery store. Perhaps your vehicle was loaded to the top with vacation gear and your family, and you ended up playing Frogger on the interstate while dealing with a flat. Regardless of your destination or the timing, you obviously had to get somewhere or you would not have been in the car in the first place. Therefore, a flat tire is always a big problem. The tire goes flat, and you go through the range of reactions and emotions, standing there with your hands on your hips while staring at the flat – perhaps letting fly a few choice words as well. It’s human nature. Eventually, you realize that it’s not going to fix itself, so you get busy changing it – or calling someone else to come do it for you. Either way, it’s up to you to rectify the situation. While lost in that moment of flat-tire funk did you ever stop to consider how fortunate you are that you have air in the other three tires? One is down, sure, but the other three are ready to roll. Of course not. You’re a leader, and it’s your job to solve problems – who has time to appreciate the three good tires?

I think this is a big miss for leaders. We tend to be so focused on the problem, challenge, or task at hand that we completely whiff when it comes to recognizing the positives. This is me and my leadership style in a nutshell. I constantly find myself zeroing-in on the next hurdle and how I am going to attack it. When that happens, I do not usually take time to recognize the good things that are happening around me. Not only does this affect my perspective and psyche as a leader, but it also affects the perspective and psyche of my team. How? Because every organization takes on the personality of its leader. If my staff sees me only focusing on the flat tires and not celebrating the good stuff, they will ultimately do the same. Over time, we’ll find ourselves drifting dangerously closer to “half-empty” territory, inadvertently creating a negative work environment. It’s odd to me that it doesn’t take much effort to slip into a half-empty mentality – yet it takes intentionality to maintain a half-full mentality. Personally, I have to be intentional about stopping to smell the roses with my team, or it won’t happen.

That’s why I like the flat-tire mentality – it allows for a realistic perspective on every situation by forcing you to fully acknowledge the ugly within the context of the beauty that surrounds it (and vice versa). If you only look for the bad in every situation, you will only find the bad. Conversely, if you only wish to see the good in every situation, that’s all you will see. Either way, you will be left with a distorted view of reality that will affect the decisions you make for your organization. So take the time to recognize the good with your team, then get to work changing that tire – you won’t get far until you do.

You may know someone in your life who is beyond half-full, someone who is more “overflow” than anything. They are so full of sunshine that you want to throw up whenever they start talking about how wonderful everything is. They won’t acknowledge it in your presence, but you just know there are problems in there somewhere. You may have referred to that person as a “Pollyanna” because of their sickeningly-positive outlook. I once worked for a leader who fit that mold perfectly. In a moment I will give you some examples you can learn from, but first I want to clear-up a misconception about good ‘ol Pollyanna.

In case you don’t know, Pollyanna is a character from a novel written in the early 1900s, made and remade into a movie many times. Pollyanna only saw the good in every situation, mostly ignoring every possible negative. She called it the “Glad game”. Her attitude was so positive, she eventually influenced those around her to only see the good. Everyone she met basked in the rainbows and unicorns that flowed from her over-the-top attitude. This is where we get the term “Pollyanna”, referring to the unbalanced “positive” perspective on things. Do you think being a “Pollyanna” is healthy for a leader? Based on what we just read, probably not. But there is a critical part to the story that most people do not address.

One day, Pollyanna loses the use of her legs due to a terrible accident. She is faced with a sobering reality, and her once sunny attitude dramatically changes. Rather than playing her Glad game, she fully recognizes her “problem”. She also finds herself surrounded with encouragement from the people in her life that care about her (more on encouragement later). In time, she learns to find the good in her situation by being glad that she once had legs that worked. She also recognizes that the remainder of her body works like it should. Then she gets down to the business of fixing her problem, and learns to walk again.

When we look at the full story, we see that Pollyanna is a flat-tire person, is she not? Honestly, she would have driven me crazy early on, had she been my leader. But once she acknowledged her problem and began to tackle it head-on, I would have been first in line to follow her.

I once followed a leader who only had the first half of Pollyanna’s perspective. Everything was wonderful even when it wasn’t. Every single positive was accentuated ad nauseam. Most problems were ignored or disregarded. His style was the definition of “whistling past the graveyard”. It was impossible to get a straight answer from him on the status of anything because everything was terrific in his view. If you objected or asked pointed questions (like I often did), he either said nothing or told you what you wanted to hear. But nothing ever changed. Over time, I either stopped asking or simply tuned-out because the words simply didn’t matter anymore. In my eyes and the eyes of many others, his credibility as a leader was hanging by a thread. Even worse, his refusal to outwardly acknowledge financial problems with his staff - and hold them accountable for their part - ultimately resulted in downsizing the staff and all but abandoning a multi-million dollar project. Ouch.

It’s perfectly fine and extremely important to acknowledge the positives as long as it’s done realistically – and you are willing to balance the positive by facing (and fixing) your problems. And yes, I think in certain situations there could be value in shielding your people from terrible news. However, if you hired the "right" people, shouldn't you be able to creatively and collaboratively include them in your problem-solving exercises? You'd be foolish not to.

Pretty much everything worthwhile goes forward under semi-chaotic conditions, mostly because you just can’t flip the business switch to "OFF". Like a hockey team, you have to change on-the-fly in real time. Your people don’t need a cheerleader for that: they need a leader who can cheer them on as they celebrate the good while smoothing bumps and removing barriers.

Picture yourself driving a carload of passengers while one of your tires is flat. You can pretend it's not flat, but everyone else knows the truth.  It's pretty hard to lead effectively if you aren’t honest with your followers, especially if they know the reality of the situation, yet see you continuinally ignoring it.


Thanks for reading.

J.

Friday, January 27, 2012

The Right Kind of Problem-Solving, Part I

While many people agree that "leadership is influence" (and I mostly tend to be one of them), I think there is something deeper at work, something that plants and cultivates the influential seeds of leadership. To find it, we have to dig down and look at leadership at it's most granular level (I really like the word "granular"). There, among the molecules, we find that leadership is...BUM-BA-DA-BUM...problem-solving. Let that simmer for a moment before you begin sparring with me. After all, necessity is the mother of invention (and innovation).

I know what you're thinking: problem-solving is reactionary by nature, so how can it equate to leadership, which is typically associated with all things proactive? Great question, and if you checked out my earlier post about Bricks, you learned how to respond to flying objects. The kind of problem-solving I’m talking about here, the kind that forms true leadership, is proactive problem-solving. Proactive problem-solving? How does that make sense? Because it comes from a leader’s desire for a preferred future - your vision. In other words, getting from where you are to where you want to be presents a big, hairy, proactively-framed problem for the leader to solve.

Consider a Quarterback who has to lead his team down the field to win the game in the final seconds. Is his vision to win? Yes. Are there problems to overcome along the way? Yes. Will his ability to solve those problems and move his team forward create influence with his teammates and followers? Yes, and the opposite is also true. Likewise, making your budget or reaching your sales targets creates a series of hurdles, challenges, and problems that you the leader must creatively overcome. Therefore, the core of leadership is problem-solving.

Proactive problem-solving can be like aiming at a moving target that you can't always see. Whether you are quarterbacking a team down the field or leading your organization, there is a significant degree of anticipation involved. Honestly, it is quite impossible to anticipate anything at all until you first have a wise and realistic understanding of these key areas:

• Your own strengths and weaknesses as a leader

• The strengths and weaknesses of your people

• What your organization does well (or even better than anyone else)

• What your organization does not do well

• The status (and source) of your current resources

You also need to know the landscape you are leading your team into. This includes your competition, the economic realities of the market (because resources matter), and of course the stakeholders you need to win-over if you are to move forward. Yes, there is much homework, soul-searching, and preparation that comes with proactive problem-solving (that's why it's proactive, right?). This is why a solid game-plan is mission critical - you will need a map to keep you on course when things get tough, which they will.

Think again of our Quarterback for a moment. His leaders are responsible for hiring the right coaches and other players who pass the filter test (fitting the DNA of the organizational vision). The coaches must then spend countless hours watching the opponent’s games on film before knowing how to formulate their own strategy based on each individual’s strengths and weaknesses. Once completed, the game-plan is communicated to the players. Our Quarterback then must execute the plan based on the key points above, solving problems and making adjustments along the path to victory. It's really no different than you leading your organization.

A coach certainly wouldn't formulate a plan that asks players to produce via their weaknesses, nor should you. A football team that has a lousy defense isn't going to count on winning the game by stopping the other team from scoring. Not only would that bring horrific results, it’s simply wrong to expect people to produce via their weakness. In considering the economic reality of your market, chew on this one: would you attempt to grow your business in a market that has zero appetite for your product or utterly lacks the resources to support it? It's bad business to waste valuable resources while trying to jam your organization down someone’s throat who doesn’t want it in the first place.

Reality check: Nobody can see around corners, nobody gets it right all the time, and hindsight is indeed 20/20. And when it comes to leadership, there are several ways to skin the cat (my apologies to cat lovers). But as the leader, it's your responsibility to know yourself, know your team, and know your resources. Develop your strategy honestly and make sure it aligns with the greater vision. Base it on the strengths and weaknesses of your organization and the realities of your market. Promote your business to those who have an appetite for what you do rather than wasting your energy on people who couldn’t care less. Learning to anticipate what might be lurking, and planning accordingly, will help you become the kind of leader who practices proactive problem-solving, which of course leads to the influence every leader so desperately wants and needs. Now that's granular.

Thanks for reading.

J.